Implicating river_otter & sea_otter → otter
Link to implication #1
Link to implication #2

Reason:

Both river otters and sea otters are species of otters.

You can't suggest multiple tag implications at once. You literally suggested river_otter_&_sea_otter...

Create an implication for one tag, for example river_otter -> otter, and then edit in any other suggestions that you may have. This is how we usually suggest multiple tag implications/aliases at once.

Related: forum #238721

Siral_Exan said:
You can't suggest multiple tag implications at once. You literally suggested river_otter_&_sea_otter...

Perhaps on first posting. I then edited the suggestions so they'd be separate. This was before I saw your posts.

Related: forum #238721

A year old and buried in the forums. As they have not been acted upon in that time, it tells me that these suggestions have already been rejected.

Clawstripe said:
I then edited the suggestions so they'd be separate.

I think what they're referring to is that your actual implication request (generated on thread posting) is the original title, and editing the "implication link" within the forum post just sends you to the implications queue with a different filter.

A year old and buried in the forums. As they have not been acted upon in that time, it tells me that these suggestions have already been rejected.

Nah, the processing is just crazy slow the last couple of years. It is a bit concerning though.