Implicating elephant → proboscidean
Link to implication

Reason:

same thing

Uh... an elephant is a proboscidean, but not all proboscideans are elephants (mammoths for example)

Anyways, here are my two related proboscidean threads, since I'm here; I've long since requested elephant and the like to imply proboscidean (as of now, proboscidean only has a base mammal implication but nothing implies proboscidean yet)

Though to be honest, with how naming conventions of species tags work, it might be better for a mod to alias proboscidean to proboscid and THEN have the species like elephant and mammoth imply proboscid rather than proboscidean. Proboscid is easier to type, too.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Uh... an elephant is a proboscidean, but not all proboscideans are elephants (mammoths for example)

Anyways, here are my two related proboscidean threads, since I'm here; I've long since requested elephant and the like to imply proboscidean (as of now, proboscidean only has a base mammal implication but nothing implies proboscidean yet)

Though to be honest, with how naming conventions of species tags work, it might be better for a mod to alias proboscidean to proboscid and THEN have the species like elephant and mammoth imply proboscid rather than proboscidean. Proboscid is easier to type, too.

oh ok.

BDS17 said:
oh ok.

The problem was your reason field. You worded it like this was an alias "These are the same thing," but you did still suggest it as an implication instead.