Implicating leashed_viewer → first_person_view
Link to implication

Reason:

After looking through the leashed_viewer tag, I noticed a number of posts that were not tagged as first_person_view, despite the first tag by definition requiring the second.

EDIT: The tag implication leashed_viewer -> first_person_view (forum #262977) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

That's because they're not supposed to have the tag. First_person_view only applies if the other character is visible, not just implied. The viewer does not count as a character.

Would looking_at_viewer and/or breaking_the_fourth_wall be applicable for the implication, or is it too much a case-by-case situation?

Cryptic_Cryptid said:
Would looking_at_viewer and/or breaking_the_fourth_wall be applicable for the implication, or is it too much a case-by-case situation?

its very possible for the character holding leash to look away or have eyes closed/covered/missing and its possible that there is no characters holding on the viewer's leash at all.

also breaking foruth wall is for completely different thing.

siikaprinssi said:
its very possible for the character holding leash to look away or have eyes closed/covered/missing and its possible that there is no characters holding on the viewer's leash at all.

also breaking foruth wall is for completely different thing.

So, too case-by-case, then. I suspected as much, but it still feels like there's a 'thing' there which warrants some kind of tag.

Possible stupid newbie question: Does bringing something up on the 'Is There A Tag For That' thread or other tagging discussion threads come with an expectation that you'll help out with the resulting tagwork? I don't mind adding/removing tags when I come across something that needs fixing, but I don't know that I'd want to commit to a big janitorial project right now.

Cryptic_Cryptid said:
Possible stupid newbie question: Does bringing something up on the 'Is There A Tag For That' thread or other tagging discussion threads come with an expectation that you'll help out with the resulting tagwork? I don't mind adding/removing tags when I come across something that needs fixing, but I don't know that I'd want to commit to a big janitorial project right now.

you dont have to work just because you ask something about tags. like its nice if you do at least something about it, but its not mandatory. not to mention that regular users are literally barred from doing too much tag edits with the tag edit limits

The tag implication leashed_viewer -> first_person_view (forum #262977) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.