Topic: Tag Alias: human_male -> human

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Genjar

Former Staff

+1
Nuke it before it spreads.

(Human_female is already invalidated, that should've been a big clue that this shouldn't be tagged. And yet, someone's managed to get it up to 500+ posts. :P)

Updated by anonymous

+1
Holy shit, this tag is on over 500 posts. How did it get this far without being aliased or invalidated. I imagine that this is going to be a ton of work for some mod to fix now.

Updated by anonymous

darryus said:
+1
Holy shit, this tag is on over 500 posts. How did it get this far without being aliased or invalidated. I imagine that this is going to be a ton of work for some mod to fix now.

It's been added fervorously by some other people.

Updated by anonymous

well, 4 years later, and this tag still exists even though several other <form>_<gender> tags were aliased away. I was going to create a bur and this was blocking it.

darryus said:
well, 4 years later, and this tag still exists even though several other <form>_<gender> tags were aliased away. I was going to create a bur and this was blocking it.

It seems to be aliased away correctly, as far as I can see: alias #14988.
The alias does not have the approver's name for some reason. Probably a quirk from the old site.

bitwolfy said:
It seems to be aliased away correctly, as far as I can see: alias #14988.
The alias does not have the approver's name for some reason. Probably a quirk from the old site.

oh, it is active, looking at the alias page is a bit weird. and I was also thinking about male_human that still exists and has a bunch of tagged posts.