Aliasing aquaphilia → drowning
Link to alias

Reason:

both tags seem to be used for exact same thing

EDIT: The tag alias aquaphilia -> drowning (forum #252430) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Hm... Looking at the small number of posts in the aquaphilia tag I'm seeing an emphasis on sex/masturbation underwater. Is there a way to tell that some of those are drowning and not just 'o-face underwater'? Is there already a tag for underwater sex/masturbation?

Aquaphilia is specific to the fetish. -1

kamimatsu said:
Aquaphilia is specific to the fetish. -1

there is absolutely no difference between the contents of these tags except aquaphilia is used a lot less. and how you are going to separate where characters are drowning for drowning fetish purposes or drowning for non drowning fetish purpose?

regsmutt said:
Hm... Looking at the small number of posts in the aquaphilia tag I'm seeing an emphasis on sex/masturbation underwater. Is there a way to tell that some of those are drowning and not just 'o-face underwater'? Is there already a tag for underwater sex/masturbation?

aquaphilia is apparently fetish of characters drowning underwater. and all those characters in the tag pretty much seems to be drowning. and i dont think that there is any separate tag for underwater sex or masturbation, but its easy to search with very simple tag combos:
underwater sex underwater masturbation

We do have underwater_sex tag, actually.

Commander_Eggplant said:
there is absolutely no difference between the contents of these tags except aquaphilia is used a lot less. and how you are going to separate where characters are drowning for drowning fetish purposes or drowning for non drowning fetish purpose?

found it
post #1031610

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaphilia_(fetish)

Aquaphilia actually isn't the fetish of drowning.

-1

Random said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaphilia_(fetish)

Aquaphilia actually isn't the fetish of drowning.

-1

I kind of figured it was just fetishes involving water, but didn't want to say anything without looking into it.

Random said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaphilia_(fetish)

Aquaphilia actually isn't the fetish of drowning.

-1

but the tag itself seems to be used exclusively for characters drowning regardles of the term's real definition.

Random said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaphilia_(fetish)

Aquaphilia actually isn't the fetish of drowning.

-1

Apparently the reason why most of the images involve asphyxiation (a few seem to be ambiguous but are tagged drowning so whatever) is probably because the tag is the work of one guy. I'd guess that this is a case of someone making a tag instead of making a set. Since it hasn't been tagged before it's probably not worth leaving on the images, but it also probably isn't worth aliasing away either.

kamimatsu said:
found it
post #1031610

but we dont separate characters eating other characters for fetish purposes and non fetish purposes either, it all gets tagged as vore regardless of intention. why we should have an entire separate tag for this just to separate the handful of posts that possibly are not made for fetish purposes (and yet its still pretty much impossible to know for sure if that was made for fetish purposes or not, and i am pretty sure that person with thing for characters drowning could still jerk off to the image you linked)

Commander_Eggplant said:
but we dont separate characters eating other characters for fetish purposes and non fetish purposes either, it all gets tagged as vore regardless of intention. why we should have an entire separate tag for this just to separate the handful of posts that possibly are not made for fetish purposes (and yet its still pretty much impossible to know for sure if that was made for fetish purposes or not, and i am pretty sure that person with thing for characters drowning could still jerk off to the image you linked)

There are a couple cases where fetish/non fetish are different tags- feces doesn't imply scat for this reason, watersports/urine is another example. Personally I don't agree with it and most of the 'non fetish' images are simply missing the fetish tag.

Commander_Eggplant said:
but we dont separate characters eating other characters for fetish purposes and non fetish purposes either, it all gets tagged as vore regardless of intention. why we should have an entire separate tag for this just to separate the handful of posts that possibly are not made for fetish purposes (and yet its still pretty much impossible to know for sure if that was made for fetish purposes or not, and i am pretty sure that person with thing for characters drowning could still jerk off to the image you linked)

A person with a fetish for anything will jerk off to anything.

Also,
post #1461244

kamimatsu said:
A person with a fetish for anything will jerk off to anything.

Also,
post #1461244

i said character eating other characters. regular bread is not a character.

kamimatsu said:

Also,
post #1461244

I have no idea why you linked that, but I am glad you did.

The tag alias aquaphilia -> drowning (forum #252430) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.