Implicating dark_souls_dark_souls_2_sark_souls_3_bloodborne → fromsoft
Link to implication
Reason:
As we already have major company copyright tags (I.E. Nintendo, Sega) Seems kinda obvious
Updated by Clawdragons
Topic: Tag Implication: dark_souls_dark_souls_2_sark_souls_3_bloodborne -> fromsoft
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
There's no such tag. (Stop trying to put multiple tags in the same field! Use the reason field for that--If they're "Related implications" then edit your post after submitting, but in this case all Dark Souls tags should be "related aliases" to alias to just dark_souls)
Updated by anonymous
its fromsoftware, not fromsoft.
Updated by anonymous
Mutisija said:
its formsoftware, not fromsoft.
*fromsoftware
Updated by anonymous
Lance_Armstrong said:
*fromsoftware
oops, typo'd. i should go to sleep
Updated by anonymous
Added both Bloodborne -> fromsoftware and dark_souls -> fromsoftware implications. Do we want to alias DS2 and DS3 to dark_souls? Or do we want to keep them separate?
Updated by anonymous
NotMeNotYou said:
Added both Bloodborne -> fromsoftware and dark_souls -> fromsoftware implications. Do we want to alias DS2 and DS3 to dark_souls? Or do we want to keep them separate?
I vote aliasing them together. That's what we typically do with franchises where the entries are not super different from each other.
Updated by anonymous