Updated by BlueDingo
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by BlueDingo
+1
For me, this is a perfect example of how implications should work. when I am searching for snakes, regardless the type, I am supposed to use "snake", not "snake + viper".
Updated by anonymous
Funny thing is, this implication was made within a minute of me posting this in the other thread.
Updated by anonymous
Actually I did both consecutively, but yeah, it was only thereafter that I realized the redundancy of viper -> reptile when viper -> snake would already do that.
Updated by anonymous
I know. It was mere coincidence that this implication and my response to the other implication both said basically the same thing.
Updated by anonymous