Topic: Tag Alias: eiffel_tower -> eiffel_tower_(disambiguation)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Aliasing eiffel_tower → eiffel_tower_(disambiguation)
Link to alias

Reason:

Landmark/building and sex position getting mixed together.

Over at forum #200391

Genjar said:
...
I just noticed the eiffel_tower tag. Used for both the actual tower, and a spitroast-type position. That's going to need clean up and/or disambiguation.

How about seperating eiffel_tower into
eiffel_tower_(position)
and eiffel_tower_(landmark) (OR eiffel_tower_(building) ??)
??

additional: Over at forum #185266 (forum topic "Ambiguous tags Discussion/listing")

BlueDingo said:
eiffel_tower - Landmark, sex position...

post #670014 post #787143

EDIT: The tag alias eiffel_tower -> eiffel_tower_(disambiguation) (forum #261492) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

Speaking of eiffel_towers...
I tagged post #1095297 with eiffel_tower, but then re-read eiffel_tower wiki which says "... threesome ..."
does the presence of the bottom-most character in that image mean the three characters on top are not in a eiffel_tower position ?

Updated by anonymous

I just cleaned out 9 posts using eiffel_tower meaning the sex position, and there's two flash posts I can't check, along with countless others that have been cleaned up before. Are we sure a disambiguation isn't necessary?