Implicating poking_out → penis
Link to implication

Reason:

Are there any possible exceptions? If the penis is covered, then it should be tagged as tenting instead.

Well there's funny ones that maybe shouldn't be tagged
post #687751
And then these ones that I don't think should anyways
post #692399

Yeah, if we go by the current wiki definition then neither of those belong under the tag. The second one kind of fits the theme, though. Hm.

post #1287147
Should we undo this because of Pseudo-penises? Those aren't real penises but are getting tagged on images like this.

Necro much?!

BlackLicorice said:
Necro much?!

One that's super relevant, man. This is the linked thread from the implications list, so when the implication needs to be undone this it where it goes.

Why do we use poking_out rather than something like exposed_penis or exposed_pseudo-penis? From my understanding that's what the exposed_x tags are usually for and it's kinda weird to break from that convention just for penises.

I also kinda feel like "poking out" has a bit of ambiguity of meaning, like, unlike most tags just reading it dosn't give you much of an idea what it means.