Implicating firefighter_boots → firefighter
Link to implication
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication firefighter_boots -> firefighter (forum #261042) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating firefighter_boots → firefighter
Link to implication
EDIT: The tag implication firefighter_boots -> firefighter (forum #261042) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Doda58 said:
Implicating firefighter_boots → firefighter
Link to implicationReason:
-1, imagine a post with two non-firefighters banging in a firefighter dressing room.
Updated by anonymous
MyNameIsOver20charac said:
-1, imagine a post with two non-firefighters banging in a firefighter dressing room.
...That example still includes a firefighter.
However, the boots can be lying around without any firefighter present.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
...That example still includes a firefighter.However, the boots can be lying around without any firefighter present.
...no?
Updated by anonymous
-1 just because I were boots I got from a surplus store doesn't make me a soldier, also they have a lot of weird stuff there I could probably find firefighter boots there too.
Updated by anonymous
i said in another forum thread that the tag is better off aliased to boots anyways. if you see the boots without anything hinting towards firefigters, i doubt anyone would recognize them as firefighter boots.
Updated by anonymous
MyNameIsOver20charac said:
...no?
Somehow I misread that as a non-firefighter banging a firefighter in the locker room.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Somehow I misread that as a non-firefighter banging a firefighter in the locker room.
Easily done, no worries ^.^
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication firefighter_boots -> firefighter (forum #261042) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.