Implicating firefighter_uniform → firefighter
Link to implication
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication firefighter_uniform -> firefighter (forum #261040) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating firefighter_uniform → firefighter
Link to implication
EDIT: The tag implication firefighter_uniform -> firefighter (forum #261040) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
-1 for this, firefighter_boots and firefighter_helmet
there can be drawings of a literal child wearing firefighter helmet. that doesnt make the child a firefighter. also there can be pictures containing firefighter uniform that is not worn by anyone. those images dont have any firefighters either.
also just alias firefighter_boots to boots. you cant really separate firefighter boots from any other types of boots.
Updated by anonymous
Yeah, seconding the -1 for that trio.
Police_uniform -> police got rejected, and this is no different from that.
I could buy a firefighter helmet off eBay, but that wouldn't make me a firefighter.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication firefighter_uniform -> firefighter (forum #261040) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.