Implicating campfire → fire
Link to implication

Reason:

It really can’t be a “campfire” unless the fuel is burning, thus meaning there is fire.

What about images like these?

post #229059 post #910040

SnowWolf said:
What about images like these?

post #229059 post #910040

That’s a good point, though I’m using the definition that is associated with the English word “campfire”.

Merriam Webster definition:
“a fire built outdoors (as at a camp or a picnic)”

Then you also have things from places like Wikipedia:

Wikipedia definition:
"A campfire is a fire at a campsite that provides light and warmth, and heat for cooking. It can also serve as a beacon, and an insect and predator deterrent.”

Then also, within the first image you linked, “Fire” is already tagged with the campfire, even though it’s just embers. The second image doesn’t have “fire” tagged on it but it does have “embers“

Oxford Dictionary of English definition:
“Embers are a small piece of burning or glowing coal or wood in a dying fire.”

Once again, fire is mentioned directly. This leads to the conclusion that even when dealing with just mere embers, a campfire isn’t a campfire without it burning in some form or fashion.

Gonna go ahead and deny this one for the same reason fireplace does not imply fire.