Aliasing litter → litter_(disambiguation)
Link to alias

Reason:

Three things have been tagged with litter tag.

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_(animal)
multiple children of an animal born in one birth
post #458788 , post #1044226 , etc tag changed to Litter_(animal)

Don't think post #799664 should be tagged with litter, only see one child.

What to do with post #162624 ?? (children not born yet)

2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_(vehicle) ,
a piece of furniture mounted on a platform and carried by muscle power. post #1193046 tag changed to Litter_(vehicle)

3) re-tag most of the rest as trash ??
( garbage and rubbish both alias to trash )

EDIT: The tag alias litter -> litter_(disambiguation) (forum #260243) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Thanks for doing the tricky work of retagging :)

ListerTheSquirrel said:
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_(animal)
multiple children of an animal born in one birth
post #458788 , post #1044226 , etc tag changed to Litter_(animal)

I wonder if we might be better off with something like "multiple_children"...? or... something something. Hm.

Let me think about this.

This should clearly cover families obviously taking care of several infants/small children post #1596451 post #726842

But what about other things?

Like... twin/triplet/quadruplet cubs running around together? or adult siblings?

Adult siblings shouldn't count... but a group of little obviously close-in-age siblings should I think?

also, where do we draw the line between twins/triplets/etc and multiple children/litter?

Does a litter have to be a certain size?

Don't think post #799664 should be tagged with litter, only see one child.

Agreed

What to do with post #162624 ?? (children not born yet)

That would be pregnant. :)

The tag alias litter -> litter_(disambiguation) (forum #260243) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.