Implicating sparkledog → unusual_coloring
Link to implication

Reason:

A sparkledog is a canine character made with odd, bright coloring. Don't see why it shouldn't imply unusual coloring.

EDIT: The tag implication sparkledog -> unusual_coloring (forum #242051) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

There are a few posts under sparkledog monochrome. Whether or not they count as sparkledog is questionable.

Maxpizzle said:
There are a few posts under sparkledog monochrome. Whether or not they count as sparkledog is questionable.

honestly since they're monochrome they shouldnt be counted as sparkledog to begin with, since they're classified by their colors and monochrome images specifically use palettes that match the backgrounds they're on. personally I feel they're mistagged with sparkledog.

facelessmess said:
honestly since they're monochrome they shouldnt be counted as sparkledog to begin with, since they're classified by their colors and monochrome images specifically use palettes that match the backgrounds they're on. personally I feel they're mistagged with sparkledog.

If it has fairy wings and star patterns on it, it probably still counts even if you can't tell what colour it is.

BlueDingo said:
If it has fairy wings and star patterns on it, it probably still counts even if you can't tell what colour it is.

ah, nearly forgot about those qualities. fair enough

I still wonder what to tag when they aren't canines.

Furrin_Gok said:
I still wonder what to tag when they aren't canines.

I would probably tag them as unusual coloring

Furrin_Gok said:
I still wonder what to tag when they aren't canines.

sparklenotdog

The tag implication sparkledog -> unusual_coloring (forum #242051) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.