Implicating li_li_stormstout → warcraft
Link to implication

Reason:

A character from World of Warcraft. And one of my personal favorites...

Also: implicating Chen_Stormstout -> Warcraft
Aliasing Illidan -> Illidan_Stormrage
Implicating Illidan_Stormrage -> Warcraft
Aliasing Tyrande -> Tyrande_Whisperwind
Implicating Tyrande_Whisperwind -> Warcraft
Implicating Thrall -> Warcraft (not Green Jesus, sadly, nor his balls. Both of these are in-game jokes)
Implicating Vol'jin -> Warcraft
Implicating Lunara_(Warcraft) -> Warcraft
Implicating Varian_Wrynn -> Warcraft
Implicating Proto-Drake -> Warcraft , a subspecies of drakes in WoW
Implicating Deathwing -> Warcraft ; if needed separate with Neltharion in an instance where he doesn't look like a massive molten dragon with sheets of metal welded on him.
Implicating Ysera -> Warcraft
Implicating Nozdormu -> Warcraft
Implicating Chromie -> Warcraft
Implicating Malygos -> Warcraft
Implicating Onyxia -> Warcraft , and there are other characters with that name so fixing as necessary
Implicating Nefarian -> Warcraft
Implicating Arthas_Menethil -> Warcraft
Implying Forsaken -> Warcraft
Implying Forsaken -> Undead (they are undead... but I don't go as far as to say zombie or etc.)
Implicating Genn_Greymane -> Warcraft
Implicating Taunka -> Warcraft , they are the Tauren's ancestors
Implicating Tuskarr -> Warcraft
Implicating Murloc -> Warcraft (as far as I know, original species)
Try to do something about Wolvar, not all characters are tagged WoW so searching/fixing may be needed.
Implicating Saberon -> Warcraft

Seperate implication group:
Implicating Aya_Blackpaw -> Hearthstone

This list is all that I've found and is tagged on this site. There are probably more unlisted but on site, and definitely more that can be listed but not on site. I have not listed any that are not on site, like the Bloodhoofs or prince Anduin.

Of note: A thrall is someone under the influence of power, commonly known by vampires and spells like enthrall, or captivating performances and speeches. However, there is no character that is called thrall with that implied, so should such occur I believe enthralled (the name for being captivated in such manner) would be a better tag name.

I noticed that Lich_King is a tag on site. I believe that it should be either disambiguated or removed: Spoiler warning Arthas Menethil is no longer the lich king, so aliasing to him will conflict with the new lich king; Bolvar Fordragon is the current lich king, but it conflicts with people calling Arthas the lich king; it could be used to describe the person donning the helm of command, but that is not useful because it will still be one of the two; and the implication to lich is incorrect, the lich king is the lord of all of the scourge, but not an actual lich.

However, it could be used for when someone cosplays as the lich king... the implication would need to be removed, and both characters would get it without them implying it (whenever Bolvar decides to show his ugly ass on site) under argument that they are dressed as the lich king since they both initially weren't.

Another alternative is Lich_King_(WoW). That'd follow the same as above, without the implication. Evidently, Lich_king was implied before knowledge of the character...

Siral_Exan said:
I noticed that Lich_King is a tag on site. I believe that it should be either disambiguated or removed: Spoiler warning Arthas Menethil is no longer the lich king, so aliasing to him will conflict with the new lich king; Bolvar Fordragon is the current lich king, but it conflicts with people calling Arthas the lich king; it could be used to describe the person donning the helm of command, but that is not useful because it will still be one of the two; and the implication to lich is incorrect, the lich king is the lord of all of the scourge, but not an actual lich.

However, it could be used for when someone cosplays as the lich king... the implication would need to be removed, and both characters would get it without them implying it (whenever Bolvar decides to show his ugly ass on site) under argument that they are dressed as the lich king since they both initially weren't.

Another alternative is Lich_King_(WoW). That'd follow the same as above, without the implication. Evidently, Lich_king was implied before knowledge of the character...

I would like to ask, do we tag the physical body or character (as if, his mind and soul)?
How would we tag a character that swaps bodies? (Unrelated to Lich King)

Edit : I just noticed you split Neltharion and Deathwing up there, even though they are the one and the same (body) but at different state of mind.

DelurC said:
I would like to ask, do we tag the physical body or character (as if, his mind and soul)?
How would we tag a character that swaps bodies? (Unrelated to Lich King)

I sincerely do not know. I'll hinge on the side of caution and TWYS with body, with alternate_species when they change species, but that is a good question. Maybe an admin can clarify.

*edit* the latter, Deathwing, has metal plates holding him together, or keeping him protected (the rest can be artistic freedom'd). I'm going to assume that Neltharion wouldn't look enough like Deathwing. but, here is a pic of Nelth, and here is a pic of Deathwing. there are similarities, but then comes that people who draw either probably wouldn't call them the opposite. Deathwing'd look like Deathwing, and Neltharion'd look like Neltharion.

DelurC said:
I would like to ask, do we tag the physical body or character (as if, his mind and soul)?
How would we tag a character that swaps bodies? (Unrelated to Lich King)

Character's Body + possession?

After going through leveling in Warlords of Draenor, I remembered the Saberon and added that to the list.

Because of forum #226363 bringing up undead, should Forsaken imply undead, or be aliased? Also, the implication needs to be made if the prior is done.

*edit* nevermind, I dun goofed and forgot that I added that in my list. Still is a topic, though.