Implicating from_behind_position → wheelbarrow_position_spoon_position
Link to implication

Reason:

Penetrator must be behind penetratee.

EDIT: The tag implication from_behind_position -> wheelbarrow_position_spoon_position (forum #229773) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

... something tells me this was set up wrong. Let me fix that:

Implicating:
Wheelbarrow_position -> from_behind_position
spoon_position -> from_behind_position

For future reference, you cannot actually make multiple suggestions in one implication/alias, but you can (and should, to save threads) make one suggestion and either edit or comment in more.

Siral_Exan said:
... something tells me this was set up wrong. Let me fix that:

Implicating:
Wheelbarrow_position -> from_behind_position
spoon_position -> from_behind_position

For future reference, you cannot actually make multiple suggestions in one implication/alias, but you can (and should, to save threads) make one suggestion and either edit or comment in more.

Specifically, do not include them in the original submission. When looking for aliases or implications, some users may actually check the list, and if it's in the "reason" field of that (only made during the initial submission, not future edits), they might assume it's already been done. Editing them in won't change the reason field on the list, so that's perfectly safe.

I wasn't sure and checked the implication help entry. I'll try to remember that. Should I delete this and submit correctly?

pixelPile said:
I wasn't sure and checked the implication help entry. I'll try to remember that. Should I delete this and submit correctly?

No need. Admin will submit the correct ones if they choose to accept them.

The tag implication from_behind_position -> wheelbarrow_position_spoon_position (forum #229773) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

done elsewhere.