Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating braided_beard → beard
Link to implication
A braided beard is a beard.
EDIT: The tag implication braided_beard -> beard (forum #228888) has been approved by @gattonero2001.
Updated by auto moderator
+1 for the first. It is logical.
+½ to the second. Apparently is acceptable; however is possible to exist a character that has simultaneously braided ponytail and braided pigtayls, although this seems to be an improbability.
'braided_tail' implies 'braided_hair' which implies 'hair'. So we really need to reorganize these tags and an un-alias along with some un-implications possibly would be a good starting point.
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
+½ to the second. Apparently is acceptable; however is possible to exist a character that has simultaneously braided ponytail and braided pigtayls, although this seems to be an improbability.
So flip it around? I suppose then all the braided tags would start with "braided".
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
'braided_tail' implies 'braided_hair' which implies 'hair'. So we really need to reorganize these tags and an un-alias along with some un-implications possibly would be a good starting point.
How did that even happen? We only tag hair for head hair, separate from manes and definitely separate from tails and body_hair/fur... Should've never been approved.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
How did that even happen? We only tag hair for head hair, separate from manes and definitely separate from tails and body_hair/fur... Should've never been approved.
At least there aren't many of them the majority of them have hair in them anyway so the damage is very low, though the implication should be removed.
Nitpick: The hair on your head is called a mane.
Updated by anonymous
BlueDingo said:
So flip it around? I suppose then all the braided tags would start with "braided".
Probably; would this be the case of doing it to 'twin_braids' as well?
-/-/-
I though a little and reached the conclusion that the following organization would be the most appropriate. What do you think?
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
I though a little and reached the conclusion that the following organization would be the most appropriate. What do you think?
+1. This way, people who want braids in general can find them without having to search every tag referring to them. It also allows the tagging of other braided things (rope, vines, bread, etc.) without the hair tag being thrown in.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication braided_beard -> beard (forum #228888) has been approved by @gattonero2001.
