Implicating scalemail_bikini → unconvincing_armor
Link to implication

Reason:

chainmail_bikini is already implicated.

could also implicate -> bikini

EDIT: The tag implication scalemail_bikini -> unconvincing_armor (forum #226482) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

It's questionable as to whether the scalemail/chainmail bikini is supposed to be armor at all since they offer hardly any protection.

I suggest scalemail_bikini I-> scalemail and chainmail_bikini I-> chainmail, implying the garments to what they're made of.

that's why it's unconvincing_armor, not armor

Knotty_Curls said:
that's why it's unconvincing_armor, not armor

unconvincing_armor implies armor.

oh

that's unfortunate

This was last discussed in forum #209907.
Scalemail_bikini probably belongs in the same pile with bikini_armor.

The tag implication scalemail_bikini -> unconvincing_armor (forum #226482) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.