This is even less of a world-ender of an issue than... well, much of all that I've brought up in this forum over the years, but I'm curious if the image dimension ratios (4:3, 16:9, etc) have to be exactly right down to the umpteenth decimal place, or if a few pixels one way or the other qualified as "close enough".
post #1149990 in particular prompted this question, though I've seen similarly close dimensions in the past.
Updated by leomole