Implicating size_play → size_difference
Link to implication

Reason:

Size-play involves a difference of sizes
-
Exceptions?

EDIT: The tag implication size_play -> size_difference (forum #214883) has been approved by @furrypickle.

No, there are no exceptions.

But does it make sense to have both size_play and size_difference? Could we just alias them?

they are same thing

That's like saying feces and scat are the same thing

one's a phenomenon, the other is a fetishization of the phenomenon

post #324364

--
That said, if we're treating non-sexual size difference situations etc the same as sexual ones, then for the purposes of the site I suppose they are identical

titanmelon said:
That's like saying feces and scat are the same thing

Or like saying that footjob and foot_fetish are the same.

Most of sex size_difference aren't size play. It's specifically for posts where the size fetish is the main focus, such as most of penis_riding and micro_on_macro.

Well, we have size_difference sex or size_difference rating:explicit.

EDIT:

Genjar said:

Most of sex size_difference aren't size play. It's specifically for posts where the size fetish is the main focus, such as most of penis_riding and micro_on_macro.

Then the wiki should be amended to reflect that.

Maxpizzle said:
Then the wiki should be amended to reflect that.

Seems like a good idea.
I would've thought that it'd be obvious from the name: food play, breath play, size play, pet play,... but I guess not.

^{...hm. We have ageplay and age_play tags? That needs an alias.}

Genjar said:
Seems like a good idea.

I took a shot at revising the size_play wiki page. Someone who understands the kink better than I might be able to improve it further. In particular, I wasn't sure what posts would make good examples, so I left those out.

Anyway, +1 to the size_play -> size_difference implication now.

+1 for implication, -1 for alias.

The tag implication size_play -> size_difference (forum #214883) has been approved by @furrypickle.