Implicating turtleneck_sweater → sweater
Link to implication

Reason:

Turtlenecks are, obviously from the full tag name, a type of sweater.

(And probably there are more examples than the 15 turtlenecks currently tagged, just haven't been put up yet.)

EDIT: The tag implication turtleneck_sweater -> sweater (forum #200746) has been approved by @Millcore.

also adding turtleneck , over 200 entrys...

R'D said:
also adding turtleneck , over 200 entrys...

Maybe alias turtleneck sweater to turtleneck. The only way somebody's gonna mix them up is if they're joking.

Furrin_Gok said:
Maybe alias turtleneck sweater to turtleneck. The only way somebody's gonna mix them up is if they're joking.

I'm more inclined towards the other way around, but given the tag count disparity there's also an argument for making just "turtleneck" the only tag, too.

Furrin_Gok said:
Maybe alias turtleneck sweater to turtleneck.

Bad idea. Not all sweaters are turtlenecks. Implicate instead.

BlueDingo said:
Bad idea. Not all sweaters are turtlenecks. Implicate instead.

...Did you read what you replied to? Turtleneck_Sweater -> Turtleneck has nothing to do with sweater from the start.

Apparently I didn't. Sorry. This is what I get for doing this tired.

BlueDingo said:
Apparently I didn't. Sorry. This is what I get for doing this tired.

I know that feeling.

The tag implication turtleneck_sweater -> sweater (forum #200746) has been approved by @Millcore.