Aliasing unwise → bad_idea
Link to alias
Reason:
They mean the same thing, and bad_idea has many more posts than unwise.
EDIT: The tag alias unwise -> bad_idea (forum #258853) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator
Topic: Tag Alias: unwise -> bad_idea
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Last tag was six years ago, maybe it could just be cleaned up?
Updated by anonymous
Sounds to me like both could be invalidated.
bitwolfy said:
Sounds to me like both could be invalidated.
I'm personally in favor of keeping some "vague" tags around, but I can understand removing them if it means less mod work. That said, most of the posts now under bad_idea can probably be moved to various forms of genital_danger_play and something along the lines of sex_while_driving. I'll try to get around to that.
Update:
Not controversial
Road sex: set #32445. Replace with driving sex.
Sharps near genitals: set #32440. Replace with genital_danger_play sharp_teeth and imminent_oral/toothy_fellatio as appropriate. Exceptions:
- post #200319 talonjob
- post #1657406: irrumatio, which the fellatio wiki implies is not compatible? Removed the existing fellatio tag, since I think irrumatio sharp_teeth is sufficient.
- post #1181496: Teeth not visible. I'll leave the genital_danger_play tag since I think it's sufficiently implied.
- post #137163: gore. genital_danger_play requires the danger not actually get fulfilled. oral/fellatio don't apply because it's vagina_dentata.
- post #1077318: Scizor with closed mouth. Since we can't see any serious teeth, and it's not implied the claws will come into play, I don't think this even counts as genital_danger_play. Not beak related; Consensus seems to be Scizors do not have beaks: scizor beak.
- post #1484409: This isn't sharp_teeth. I want to put on toothy_fellatio, but this is imminent_oral... I guess creepy is good enough.
Guns: set #32442. Replace with gun_in_* and hoplophilia (which we should probably alias to something less obscure). Created the penis_in_gun tag for post #964893. Found licking_gun, which needs to get aliased to gun_lick.
Beaks: set #32446 replace with beakjob.
Bombs: set #32441 replace with explosive_in_* or firework_in_* as appropriate.
A little controversial
- post #2137450: Kind of TWYK? The character has an acid body, which is going to melt the penis. Added imminent_pain and imminent_castration.
- post #1752699: Created firework_in_breasts, which will may never see use again.
Please advise
set #32444: Harassing/groping a girl, with the framing that this will result in slapstick violence. Possibly it should just be imminent_grope? I've asked in the "Do we have a tag for that" thread.
Now that I'm halfway through with this, yeah, I can see why these need to get invalidated.
It's unwise to assume unwise is used more often than bad_idea and I think it should be replaced.
Unwise sounds cooler tho...
matrixmash said:
Now that I'm halfway through with this, yeah, I can see why these need to get invalidated.
I agree that bad_idea is not a good name for a tag and that most of its uses should be replaced by alternatives with more precise definitions. However, I can't think of a good name for what is happening in post #2761256. It does not seem to fall under any of your current projects (thank you for your service, by the way) and I feel that something like imminent_death or imminent_pain do not capture the artistic intention very well. There is an element of humor that can't be separated from the concept of the character's actions and/or choices being a "bad idea".
gattonero2001 said:
I agree that bad_idea is not a good name for a tag and that most of its uses should be replaced by alternatives with more precise definitions. However, I can't think of a good name for what is happening in post #2761256. It does not seem to fall under any of your current projects (thank you for your service, by the way) and I feel that something like imminent_death or imminent_pain do not capture the artistic intention very well. There is an element of humor that can't be separated from the concept of the character's actions and/or choices being a "bad idea".
Maybe the scenario doesn't need to be encapsulated into a tag
Final Semifinal update:
set:bi_regret_mm: Moved posts to the regret tag, which is another "jokey" tag that can get invalidated or not at a later date.
set:bi_jokes_mm: I'm going to leave the bad_idea tag alone. If we do decide to keep the tag, I vote that this is the kind of content it should have.
post #790698 post #1663819: Moved to it's_a_trap
Stuff I will remove the tag from in a week if nobody has a comment:
set:bi_fire_mm Sex with fire/heat: burning_sex? extra_hot_sex? Nothing exists at the moment. If nobody has any suggestions in a week, I'll just strip the tag. There's no obvious touchpoint that people will use in the future.
set:bi_yes_mm Stuff that actually, factually is a bad_idea. Not in a funny/sexy way; just dangerous. Of course, some of this you could argue is actually funny, which is part of why I think the tag should be invalidated; it's unclear what it means/how it should be used, and a pain to sort anyway. If it's meant to be serious, then it should have a clearer name. dangerous might be a better tag.
set:bi_no_mm Stuff I can't tell why bad_idea was ever added.
Updated
The tag alias unwise -> bad_idea (forum #258853) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.