Implicating pyroar_(f) → pyroar
Link to implication

Reason:

Refers to only female Pyroar, unless we start to use very specific tags such as renamon_(m/f/intersex), krystal_(m/f/intersex)... this one is redundant.

Edit: This is mistake. I meant alias, not implicate.

EDIT: The tag implication pyroar_(f) -> pyroar (forum #210389) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.

Let's alias it instead,

The tag implication pyroar_(f) -> pyroar (forum #210389) has been rejected by @SnowWolf.