Implicating pink_pawpads → pawpads
Link to implication

Reason:

Sorry, missed a few last time.
cyan_pawpads -> pawpads
glowing_pawpads -> pawpads
teal_pawpads -> pawpads

EDIT: Perhaps cyan_* should implicate blue_*? And teal_* implicate green_*?

also glowing_pawpads -> glowing

Mutisija said:
also glowing_pawpads -> glowing

Not better to do glowing_pawpads -> bioluminescence (-> glowing)?

Chessax said:
Not better to do glowing_pawpads -> bioluminescence (-> glowing)?

There's some exceptions that prevent that from working. Robots can have pawpads.
post #410071

purple.beastie said:
There's some exceptions that prevent that from working. Robots can have pawpads.
post #410071

Very true
*grumbles* Stupid robots

I've made the following changes:

• Implication: pink_pawpads -> pawpads (approved)
• Implication: cyan_pawpads -> pawpads (approved)
• Implication: glowing_pawpads -> pawpads (approved)
• Implication: glowing_pawpads -> glowing (approved)
• Implication: teal_pawpads -> pawpads (approved) (hope this color either keeps getting tagged or invalidated or aliased with blue or cyan)