Implicating controlled → possession
Link to implication

Reason:

Unlike fusion/merging, possession is inherently about control of another person (or thing) regardless of consent. In a willing possessions, the dominating force still takes over the host.

Gee, I hope I did the this--->that right...

EDIT: The tag implication controlled -> possession (forum #193753) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

you mean other way around? because all controlling is not possession

Mutisija said:
you mean other way around? because all controlling is not possession

I'm new here. Whatever you say, mister. I'll take all the help I can get.

The tag implication controlled -> possession (forum #193753) has been rejected by @furrypickle.