So. Two pictures got deleted from my posts.

This humanized Honedge and this humanized Doublade

The reason for deletion was:

If they look like normal humans, they fall under the no human-only post rule.

I understand this rule
But this made me wonder.

What makes a humanized version of something fit to be posted on this site?

Has it something to do with how the humanized version looks?

.
Also i'd argue the reason that was given for the deletion.

If they look like normal humans, they fall under the no human-only post rule.

Since both pictures aren't human-only. Both of the females in their pictures are holding the pokemon that they are based on in their hands. Meaning that it should've been relevant for this site. Or are Pokemon based on inanimate objects not relevant to this site?

Those pictures you uploaded were basically female anime girls wearing outfits close to the Pokemon designs, which isn't enough to qualify as "Pokemon material". If they were anthrofied or Pokemorph, they would have been completely fine because they still retain most of their characteristics without being completely humans, something like these

post #956948 post #905966 post #489725

Neitsuke said:
Those pictures you uploaded were basically female anime girls wearing outfits close to the Pokemon designs

MLP also has images like that and they get approved. What's the difference?
(Not that i have something against MLP)

Also there are pokemon pictures like that that are approved, so what gives

Those have animal ears and/or tails and/or horns, they're not wearing a MLP outfit

The MLP pictures we approve still retain some animal features, be it hooves, wings, horns, tails, or horsecocks.

Let's take the recent humanized pokegirls you uploaded. I approved these:

post #992514 post #992513 post #992508 post #992481 post #992477 post #992027 post #991997

because they seem to have some clear non-human characteristics. Animals ears that aren't a hat, tails, antennae, etc.

I am holding off on these:

post #992040 post #992016 post #992012 post #992010 post #992002 post #991902 post #991896 post #991893 post #991870 post #991869

These two especially look entirely human to me:

post #991891 post #991879

Your argument about the two girls holding the honedge/doublade is a pretty good one I guess. It would be easy for an admin/janitor to miss if they did not play Pokemon Gen 69 and know that there is a sword Pokemon.

At the end of the day I'd be happy with approving all of the pics, but I try to be conservative in my judgment.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Let's take the recent humanized pokegirls you uploaded. I approved these:

post #992514 post #992513 post #992508 post #992481 post #992477 post #992027 post #991997

because they seem to have some clear non-human characteristics. Animals ears that aren't a hat, tails, antennae, etc.

I am holding off on these:

post #992040 post #992016 post #992012 post #992010 post #992002 post #991902 post #991896 post #991893 post #991870 post #991869

These two especially look entirely human to me:

post #991891 post #991879

Your argument about the two girls holding the honedge/doublade is a pretty good one I guess. It would be easy for an admin/janitor to miss if they did not play Pokemon Gen 69 and know that there is a sword Pokemon.

At the end of the day I'd be happy with approving all of the pics, but I try to be conservative in my judgment.

I understand the reason for holding those images. Though that Lilligant i posted is an surperior version of an image that was already approved on this website. Would the surperior have a chance of overwriting the inferior?

Marowaque said:
I understand the reason for holding those images. Though that Lilligant i posted is an surperior version of an image that was already approved on this website. Would the surperior have a chance of overwriting the inferior?

Yeah. Handled.