Topic: What factors your sexual attraction to birds?

Posted under Off Topic

Now I know what you're thinking. "Birds? But their beaks are hard and pointy - how can do they anything with their mouths? They're tiny and fragile. They don't even have dangly bits!"

Well, guess what? We kiss just fine with our beaks, thank you.

post #836069

Also fuck you, we can suck dick just fine. We have technology.

post #428529 post #439652

Anyone who's been love-nibbled and licked by a bird can attest that we are great bedmates. Also, we make cute noises. Sometimes, we make really loud noises. Even the biggest and baddest birds just melt in your arms. We're super smart too.

In addition, we don't need dangly bits to birdbang you into a coma.

Discuss why you're sexually attracted to me birds.

Updated by hsauq

Final picture is invalidated evidence, you see stretching on the beak.

Case dismissed.

Updated by anonymous

I used to have a bird friend not anymore though, I'm sad now.

Updated by anonymous

EightyNine said:
Final picture is invalidated evidence, you see stretching on the beak.

Case dismissed.

I know talking about the birds and the bees makes you uncomfortable

it's okay, you're in a safe place

Updated by anonymous

[color=GreenYellow]I'm into feral stuff so I don't really like birds.

[color=GreenYellow]Ofcourse there are some exceptions:

post #867430

Updated by anonymous

Lance_Armstrong said:
Song and dance.

Maybe join the Pirates of Penzance?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TunwAqnZm4g

To the OP: I'm not really into birds myself sexually speaking, at least not real ones. I will say that I've always liked Falco Lombardi from StarFox like you mentioned in your original post, and I also find that some artists, like Ruaidri , do an outstanding job with anthro birds, such as in these pics below:

post #96694
post #93017
post #161790
post #182129

I especially like the way he does the feathers. I wish I knew how to draw feathers like that. All soft and fluffy.

So I'm into anthro birds a bit.

Updated by anonymous

I'm good when they don't have separate wings and arms

Updated by anonymous

Knotty_Curls said:
Well, guess what? We kiss just fine with our beaks, thank you.

Also fuck you, we can suck dick just fine. We have technology.

*looks down* you better be careful down there and hope nothing bad happens on accident. :/ those beaks can be rather sharp sometimes.

aside from such anatomy related risks, i like all things non-human. well, unless it's something really creepy (bugs! though changelings are kinda ok. freaky bug ponies) or really freaky (japan, 'nuff said).

Astra1223 said:
post #1033948

nice pic, that could also count on my post in that thread about men.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
You mean like yours?

you know, i never really gave that part of koopa anatomy much thought. maybe? could just be the case with certain species of koopa or the dry bones re-animated ones.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

treos said:
those beaks can be rather sharp sometimes.

Not particularly so, certainly not as sharp as teeth. Beaks are for food collecting, preening, digging, and carrying. Not for cutting.

From personal experience, I'd say that only birds that have sharp beak are birds of prey -- and the hook is the only sharp part.

I'd be more worried of the talons.

Updated by anonymous

BirdCheese accounts for about 80% of my sexual attraction to birds. The remaining 20% is eggs and feathers and fluff.

Updated by anonymous

We're all sexually attracted to birds now (this is non-negotiable) because at some point in time, we started making little stone bowls to watch them publicly bathe in.

And then we grew a tradition of questionable naming conventions including: tits, titmouse(s), boobies, swallows, cocks, cockatoos, cockatiels, peacocks, woodcocks, woodpeckers, dickcissels(?), shags, etc.

So that might've helped.

Updated by anonymous

Calcutta said:
We're all sexually attracted to birds now (this is non-negotiable) because at some point in time, we started making little stone bowls to watch them publicly bathe in.

And then we grew a tradition of questionable naming conventions including: tits, titmouse(s), boobies, swallows, cocks, cockatoos, cockatiels, peacocks, woodcocks, woodpeckers, dickcissels(?), shags, etc.

So that might've helped.

Nutcracker.
Thrush.
Little Bustard.
Great Bustard.
Twite.
Blackcock.
Turdus Maximus.
Bugeranus.
Arses Insularis.
Botryotinia Fuckeliana (a fungus not a bird but I thought I'd like to add it!).
Poospiza Hypochondria.

Probably loads more.

Updated by anonymous

rhyolite said:
Nutcracker.
Thrush.
Little Bustard.
Great Bustard.
Twite.
Blackcock.
Turdus Maximus.
Bugeranus.
Arses Insularis.
Botryotinia Fuckeliana (a fungus not a bird but I thought I'd like to add it!).
Poospiza Hypochondria.

Probably loads more.

I egret nothing about this.

But yeah, whether it's taxonomy or colloquialisms, I get the feeling people had a lot of fun naming things.

Updated by anonymous

But fish and plants have been around longer than birds. If anything, you're appropriating them.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
But fish and plants have been around longer than birds. If anything, you're appropriating them.

Single celled organisms? Luxury!

Updated by anonymous

I do wish more artists would stop depicting anthro birds with talons for arms though.

[1] [2] [3]

Sometimes they're able to make these look okay, but for the most part it detracts from the image. Plus it looks like they were trying to get out of drawing wings.

Updated by anonymous