Tag Implication: bound -> restrained

In category: Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating boundrestrained
Link to implication

Reason:

the wiki page for bound makes it pretty clear that restrained should apply in all cases with the following sentence:

This tag is used in all cases where a character is tied up, chained, cuffed, or otherwise restrained.

The restrained page lists rope as a possible means of restraint as well as "various devices" so I don't think there's any situation where a character could be bound but not restrained somehow.

Note that it shouldn't imply restraints because, while they are frequently co-present, the pose might hide them, e.g. behind clothing or the body of a character.

There is already an implication suggestion for fully_bound to restrained, this suggestion encompasses that one since fully_bound implies bound. Link to that post.


not all bound characters are necessarily restrained. for example character with rope tied around their torso like this is bound but not restrained at all


I don't think that counts as bound, according to the tag wiki page for it. It's more like rope as clothing. As it's used now, it seems like it's unambiguously a restraint thing.

SnowWolf
Former Staff
5 days ago
black_fur blue_eyes blue_feathers blue_hair equine fan_character feathered_wings feathers female feral flying fur hair hi_res horn mammal multicolored_hair my_little_pony shilokh smile snowdrift snowflake solo star watermark white_feathers winged_unicorn wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 21
User: SnowWolf
Date: July 28, 2012

Snergal said:
I don't think that counts as bound, according to the tag wiki page for it. It's more like rope as clothing. As it's used now, it seems like it's unambiguously a restraint thing.

I am pretty sure that that was intended as a playful example, not a direct, exact 1:1 comparison.