Tag Implication: ducktales_(2017) -> disney

In category: Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating ducktales_(2017)disney
Link to implication

Reason:

Ducktales is a Disney copyright.


Chaser said:
Implicating ducktales_(2017)disney
Link to implication

Reason:

Ducktales is a Disney copyright.

I'd rather implicate ducktales_(2017) to ducktales (since one, it's part of the same franchise, and two, not everyone is going to think of searching with the all important year disambiguation at first) and implicate the latter to disney, so both would be covered.


BooruHitomi said:
I'd rather implicate ducktales_(2017) to ducktales (since one, it's part of the same franchise, and two, not everyone is going to think of searching with the all important year disambiguation at first) and implicate the latter to disney, so both would be covered.

Should we first tempalias the old posts to a different tag so that people who want the old ones can find them still?


Furrin_Gok said:
Should we first tempalias the old posts to a different tag so that people who want the old ones can find them still?

If that's the case, then we should make ducktales_(1987) a tag for characters exclusively to or styled after how they appear in the classic series, while ducktales should be for the franchise overall.

SnowWolf
Contributor
12 days ago
black_fur blue_eyes blue_feathers blue_hair equine fan_character feathered_wings feathers female feral flying fur hair hi_res horn mammal multicolored_hair my_little_pony shilokh smile snowdrift snowflake solo star watermark white_feathers winged_unicorn wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 20
User: SnowWolf
Date: July 28, 2012

I do think there should be a differentiation between the two... on the other hand, there are only about 200 posts and MOST of them seem to be new ducktales... so perhaps the differentiation's moot?