BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Why does the swallowing wiki specifically mention prey and genital fluids but have no mention of, say, food?

animated anthro big_eyes burger canine clothed clothing dog eating food fur grey_fur holding_food holding_object licking licking_lips male mammal milkandcooki misterslunchy pants simple_background slightly_chubby solo standing teeth tongue tongue_out toony topless white_background

Rating: Safe
Score: 14
User: Milkandcooki
Date: November 25, 2014

Genjar
Former Staff
3 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clear_membrane clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 244
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

BlueDingo said:
Why does the swallowing wiki specifically mention prey and genital fluids but have no mention of, say, food?

Been wondering the same.
And that also goes for stuffed bellies. Which tend to get tagged as vore even when there's no vore bulges or other such signs, ...some people do have a fetish for overeating, and it's actually a pretty common fetish (outside the furdom at least). Kind of annoying that some taggers automatically assume that if someone's belly is full, they must've eaten somebody. :/

BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

If a character is wearing a full outfit but said outfit is very heavily damaged, does fully_clothed still apply or does another "clothed" tag come into play?

2015 3_toes anthro black_nose blue_eyes brown_fur brown_hair claws clothed clothing flinters football_player footwear front_view fur hair hands_behind_head hi_res kangaroo legwear looking_at_viewer male mammal marsupial midriff nfl pants pheagle philadelphia_eagles pose shirt shoes short_hair simple_background smile socks solo t-shirt tan_fur toes torn_clothing transformation uniform white_background

Rating: Safe
Score: 5
User: PheagleAdler
Date: February 20, 2015

Genjar
Former Staff
3 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clear_membrane clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 244
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

BlueDingo said:
If a character is wearing a full outfit but said outfit is very heavily damaged, does fully_clothed still apply or does another "clothed" tag come into play?

2015 3_toes anthro black_nose blue_eyes brown_fur brown_hair claws clothed clothing flinters football_player footwear front_view fur hair hands_behind_head hi_res kangaroo legwear looking_at_viewer male mammal marsupial midriff nfl pants pheagle philadelphia_eagles pose shirt shoes short_hair simple_background smile socks solo t-shirt tan_fur toes torn_clothing transformation uniform white_background

Rating: Safe
Score: 5
User: PheagleAdler
Date: February 20, 2015

Not sure. I can see how that could be considered fully clothed, on the basis that ragged clothing is still clothing and it still fully covers the crotch.

And shoes aren't required for the tag, at least not for characters who don't have humanoid feet.

So I'm ambivalent about that. Seems like a poor fit for fully_clothed, but technically correct...?


Genjar said:
Not sure. I can see how that could be considered fully clothed, on the basis that ragged clothing is still clothing and it still fully covers the crotch.

And shoes aren't required for the tag, at least not for characters who don't have humanoid feet.

So I'm ambivalent about that. Seems like a poor fit for fully_clothed, but technically correct...?

fully_clothed torn_clothes is a viable thing. We could really use a tag for highly damaged clothing, though.

BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Furrin_Gok said:
fully_clothed torn_clothes is a viable thing.

True, but to what extent can the clothes be damaged before fully_clothed stops applying? Something like post #1228843 makes sense because it's just a few rips but if the damage is severe enough, it may fall into partially_clothed territory instead.

BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Another clothing-related one: Headshot portraits, bust portraits and half-length portraits where no clothing is visible. Do we assume the character is topless or nude? The tags are unclear on this with some tagged nude and some tagged topless.

abstract_background blue_background blue_eyes blue_theme clockwork-caribou dragon headshot_portrait horn icon looking_at_viewer low_res male portrait reptile scalie screw_the_shadow_walker simple_background smile solo

Rating: Safe
Score: 6
User: TheScrew
Date: March 13, 20172017 abs anthro biceps black_nose blue_eyes bust_portrait canine clothed clothing digital_media_(artwork) fur grey_fur hi_res hittoga looking_at_viewer male mammal multicolored_fur muscular muscular_male pecs portrait solo topless two_tone_fur white_fur wolf

Rating: Safe
Score: 5
User: Rysaerio-Misoery
Date: March 30, 2017anthro bone canine crosshatching fur greyscale half-length_portrait male mammal monochrome portrait ribcage simple_background skeleton sketch smile solo teeth ulvehunden undead whiskers white_background wolf zombie

Rating: Safe
Score: 11
User: cookiekangaroo
Date: January 17, 2012

Strongbird
Contributor
3 months ago

BlueDingo said:
Another clothing-related one: Headshot portraits, bust portraits and half-length portraits where no clothing is visible. Do we assume the character is topless or nude? The tags are unclear on this with some tagged nude and some tagged topless.

I'd say nude. Topless implies clothed, which in turn implies clothing, neither of which are visible in the image and thus shouldn't be part of the tags.


BlueDingo said:
Another clothing-related one: Headshot portraits, bust portraits and half-length portraits where no clothing is visible. Do we assume the character is topless or nude? The tags are unclear on this with some tagged nude and some tagged topless.

abstract_background blue_background blue_eyes blue_theme clockwork-caribou dragon headshot_portrait horn icon looking_at_viewer low_res male portrait reptile scalie screw_the_shadow_walker simple_background smile solo

Rating: Safe
Score: 6
User: TheScrew
Date: March 13, 20172017 abs anthro biceps black_nose blue_eyes bust_portrait canine clothed clothing digital_media_(artwork) fur grey_fur hi_res hittoga looking_at_viewer male mammal multicolored_fur muscular muscular_male pecs portrait solo topless two_tone_fur white_fur wolf

Rating: Safe
Score: 5
User: Rysaerio-Misoery
Date: March 30, 2017anthro bone canine crosshatching fur greyscale half-length_portrait male mammal monochrome portrait ribcage simple_background skeleton sketch smile solo teeth ulvehunden undead whiskers white_background wolf zombie

Rating: Safe
Score: 11
User: cookiekangaroo
Date: January 17, 2012

better to not assume and just tag what is visible.

In regards to headshots that only include a sliver of neck like your first example, probably best to just not tag anything at all, sense they also arnt given any bodyform(anthro, feral, eta.) in that case with no reference points to rely on. only exception was if some form of collarband of a turtleneck shirt or the like is seen then it could be marked clothed... for reference partially clothed is still clothed thru the former could never be used because that is going on a assumption of the specific type of clothed without reference point.

In regards to the other 2 examples they would be tagged nude because that is what is visible, whats outside of the image is irelivant if all you can make is a 50/50 assumption.

just my opinion as to how id be tagging it

BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Strongbird said:
I'd say nude. Topless implies clothed, which in turn implies clothing, neither of which are visible in the image and thus shouldn't be part of the tags.

That's what I was thinking as well. But then again, because you can't see the bottom half, you can't apply nude or topless without making an assumption which we're generally not supposed to do but can't avoid doing in this case unless we tag neither, which doesn't help at all. For situations like this, I'd rather assume the clothing isn't there and tag nude (or mostly_nude if they're wearing a hat or something).

At least the opposite case is a little easier, ie. when clothing is present and you can't see the bottom half. Clothed definitely applies but bottomless and fully_clothed can't be determined so I leave those off.

2017 5_fingers anthro biped black_claws black_nose brown_clothing brown_fur brown_topwear cabin cat claws clothed clothing detailed_background diato_maceous feline forest front_view fur half-length_portrait heterochromia hi_res jacket lantern looking_at_viewer male mammal multicolored_fur oil_painting outside painting_(artwork) portrait shirt siamese sidonie signature solo standing traditional_media_(artwork) tree two_tone_fur whiskers white_clothing white_fur white_shirt white_topwear window

Rating: Safe
Score: 11
User: Cash_Banooca
Date: May 10, 2017


i understand this is the question thread (??) i wanted to ask why all the pics are being replaced whit new pics but bigger? i understand that there is a site online when u can get lots of pictures on its raw format (bigger) but its kinda odd to see alot of pictures from years ago popping up on the main page all the time lately.
i also got lots of favorite pics and now some are being deleted and replaced :-(


There's a user who has created the not furry focus tag and has started using it on the site. Beyond some images that are clearly mistagged (including Pokémon and dual focus images), is this a necessary tag? It seems like not furry covers this kind of stuff well enough.

Genjar
Former Staff
3 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clear_membrane clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 244
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Seems useful enough, since not_furry is only applicable if all characters in the post are not furry. Though attempting to keep not_furry_focus separate from human_focus seems unintuitive, and might lead to problems.

As for the mistags, I don't see it. Pokemon are not innately furry, so the tag (if kept) should apply to posts such as post #1266120. Gardevoir is a humanoid not based on any recognizable animal, therefore not furry.


Genjar said:
Gardevoir is a humanoid not based on any recognizable animal, therefore not furry.

But it's an animal in and of itself, and Gardevoir without the not_furry tag is more common than Gardevoir with the not_furry tag

Genjar
Former Staff
3 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clear_membrane clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 244
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

Strikerman said:
But it's an animal in and of itself, and Gardevoir without the not_furry tag is more common than Gardevoir with the not_furry tag

If it doesn't look like an animal, it doesn't get tagged as an animal.
Also, Gardevoir are often paired with furries, in which case not_furry doesn't apply. Try gardevoir -not_furry -anthro -feral -animal_humanoid instead.

(Note that there are quite a few untagged anthros in the results. Undertagging is always a problem with most things.)

BlueDingo
Privileged
3 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Strikerman said:
But it's an animal in and of itself

So are humans, but we put them into a different category nonetheless.


What should the tag be for getting hit with your cock?


is tagged with cockslap, but the wiki for cockslap says
"When a person's cock slaps their partner."

slapped_by_own_cock ?

Closest tag I noticed was penis_on_own_face (with one upload), but seems like a different thing to me.

O16
Member
3 months ago
2016 :d <3 abomasnow alakazam amaura animate_inanimate antennae anthro arcanine avalugg badge bastiodon beak beartic biped black_body black_eyes black_fur black_horn black_nose black_scales black_sclera blue_body blue_claws blue_eyes blue_feathers blue_fur blue_pawpads blue_scales blue_sclera bovine brown_body brown_feathers brown_fur canine claws cloud cranidos crotch_tuft digitigrade dipstick_tail directional_arrow eeveelution electricity english_text excadrill eyes_closed fangs feathered_wings feathers feline feral fire floating floatzel flower fur fur_markings gem gengar gloves_(marking) gogoat gold_scales green_body green_feathers green_fur grey_body grin group hair half-closed_eyes hand_holding hawlucha haxorus heliolisk hi_res hidden_eyes hindpaw hooves horn ice insect_wings jellicent kingdra kneeling leaf leavanny lillipup long_tail looking_at_another looking_at_viewer looking_down lucario lunatone luxray magneton makuhita mammal markings meowstic milotic miltank mismagius monster multi_tail multicolored_body multicolored_feathers multicolored_fur multicolored_scales multicolored_tail musical_note neck_tuft nidoking nintendo no_sclera nosepass on_one_leg onix open_mouth orange_body orange_fur panpour pansage pansear pawpads paws pidgeotto piloswine pink_body pink_fur pink_nose pink_sclera plant pokéball pokémon pokémon_(species) poliwrath purple_body purple_fur purple_hair quadruped raichu red_body red_claws red_eyes red_feathers red_fur red_hooves red_nose red_sclera ribbons rodent rose roserade scales screw scyther sharp_teeth shell silver_body sitting slaking sloth smile socks_(marking) solrock sparkle spikes spiral standing star starmie steam steelix stripes sun swanna sylveon tail_tuft talons tan_body tan_feathers tan_fur tan_scales teal_eyes teeth text toe_claws tongue torkoal tuft tusks two_tone_body two_tone_fur tyrunt video_games vileplume vivillon watchog water weezing whirlipede white_body white_eyes white_feathers white_fur white_hair white_scales wide_eyed wings yellow_beak yellow_body yellow_eyes yellow_feathers yellow_fur yellow_sclera zebstrika かんな_2日目東m02a

Rating: Safe
Score: 49
User: Rad_Dudesman
Date: February 28, 2016

ListerTheSquirrel said:
What should the tag be for getting hit with your cock?


is tagged with cockslap, but the wiki for cockslap says
"When a person's cock slaps their partner."

slapped_by_own_cock ?

Closest tag I noticed was penis_on_own_face (with one upload), but seems like a different thing to me.

Perhaps just adapt the wiki to include such cases as well, because a whole new tag for that probably would be unnecessarily specific.

Genjar
Former Staff
3 months ago
2011 annoyed antennae arthropod biped black_markings blue_eyes clear_membrane clothed clothing crossed_arms cute duo feral front_view green_body human insect insect_wings lifting lol_comments male mammal markings moth nisimawari pellucid_hawk_moth portrait quadruped shirt shorts simple_background solo_focus spread_wings standing three-quarter_portrait three-quarter_view traditional_media_(artwork) watercolor_(artwork) white_background wings

Rating: Safe
Score: 244
User: Genjar
Date: May 29, 2013

ListerTheSquirrel said:
What should the tag be for getting hit with your cock?

autocockslap, judging by the existing tags (autofellatio, etc).

BlueDingo
Privileged
2 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

A user is adding yoshi_(character) to images he believes is the same green yoshi from every game with a playable green yoshi in it.

1. How could you possibly know it's that yoshi when he looks identical to most of the other green yoshis?
2. How do you know it's even the same one in every game? For all we know, each series (Kart, Golf, Party, etc.) could have a different one.


BlueDingo said:
A user is adding yoshi_(character) to images he believes is the same green yoshi from every game with a playable green yoshi in it.

1. How could you possibly know it's that yoshi when he looks identical to most of the other green yoshis?
2. How do you know it's even the same one in every game? For all we know, each series (Kart, Golf, Party, etc.) could have a different one.

We can safely assume that the Main Character Yoshis are all one and the same (outside of Yoshi's Island, at least; that one has a new yoshi every level), so unless the artist/owner says it's just a generic green Yoshi it should be safe to tag.


Considering the _penetrating tags that we have, how come we don't have a set of parallel tags for being penetrated (as far as I've seen)?

BlueDingo
Privileged
2 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Furrin_Gok said:
We can safely assume that the Main Character Yoshis are all one and the same (outside of Yoshi's Island, at least; that one has a new yoshi every level), so unless the artist/owner says it's just a generic green Yoshi it should be safe to tag.

By that logic, red shy guys should be tagged shy_guy_(character) because the playable ones are usually red and the yoshi_(character) tag applies to most green yoshi images. My point is if there's no way to differentiate a specific one (assuming it even is a specific one) from the rest, it shouldn't be given a unique tag, especially when green_yoshi already covers them and not much else.


BlueDingo said:
By that logic, red shy guys should be tagged shy_guy_(character) because the playable ones are usually red and the yoshi_(character) tag applies to most green yoshi images. My point is if there's no way to differentiate a specific one (assuming it even is a specific one) from the rest, it shouldn't be given a unique tag, especially when green_yoshi already covers them and not much else.

(i'm the yoshi character tagger btw; I also spent all last night tagging almost every single yoshi image with their colored species..... man was that tiring lmao)

You are right in that green yoshi mostly covers them, but what of images explicitly referencing the canon yoshi character? The Just Dessert pool for example is a pool comic explicitly focusing on the main yoshi character who is friends with the main mario brothers.


This image as another example also is EXPLICITLY referencing the main yoshi (the text is a direct, infamously misspelled textbox from mario 64 where you meet yoshi)

I tried to be as cautious as I could in its use and only use the character tag for images which seemed to apply to them or are heavily publicly assumed to be them (explicit references to the character, playable character in spinoff/main titles which is assumed to be the main green yoshi, etc)

If it's been mistagged, I'll easily remove it and we can just keep the green yoshi tag instead, as it's a relatively small tag compared to the green yoshi tag in itself and isn't like.. a wildly out of control tag. But so far I feel its use has been valid, unless there's a valid reason as to why main playable green yoshi in main/spinoff games isn't seen as the main yoshi or perhaps i've mistagged something.


I'm going to bring this up but put no effort into the argument, but names are TWYK. They are the only acceptable TWYK tags (ignoring up for debate ones, I'm being simple). So, it should rely on the source information, not TWYS.

If there is a main playable Yoshi, then even without a name it counts as a character. Whether or not it is is another question, one I can't answer.


Siral_Exan said:
I'm going to bring this up but put no effort into the argument, but names are TTWK. They are the only acceptable TWYK tags. So, it should rely on the source information, not TWYS.

If there is a main playable Yoshi, then even without a name it counts as a character. Whether or not it is is another question, one I can't answer.

Gotcha gotcha; luckily the yoshi character tag is relatively small so it'll be an easy fix no problem; they'll still all keep the green yoshi tag of course.

Strongbird
Contributor
2 months ago

Siral_Exan said:
I'm going to bring this up but put no effort into the argument, but names are TTWK. They are the only acceptable TWYK tags. So, it should rely on the source information, not TWYS.

I don't mean to be pedantic, but how about tags like year of creation (e.g. 2016) and medium (e.g. digital_media_(artwork) and the like)? In particular the latter, some digital pieces look indistinguishable from traditional art, in which case an outside source can say whether or not it's digital or traditional.


Strongbird said:
I don't mean to be pedantic, but how about tags like year of creation (e.g. 2016) and medium (e.g. digital_media_(artwork) and the like)? In particular the latter, some digital pieces look indistinguishable from traditional art, in which case an outside source can say whether or not it's digital or traditional.

You took me too literally... do I have to actually list every single TWYK tag and every single TWYS tag?

BlueDingo
Privileged
2 months ago
2012 5_fingers abstract_background anthro armor blood blood_on_weapon bovine cleaning digital_media_(artwork) digital_painting_(artwork) eye_scar facial_scar front_view fur green_fur greg_staples half-length_portrait half_portrait holding_object holding_weapon horn magic_the_gathering male mammal melee_weapon minotaur official_art plate_armor portrait scar shoulder_guards simple_background soldier solo standing sword weapon

Rating: Safe
Score: 2
User: Circeus
Date: January 03, 2015

Strongbird said:
how about tags like year of creation (e.g. 2016)

In that case, you're not tagging the content. TWYS relates to content.

facelessmess said:
Gotcha gotcha; luckily the yoshi character tag is relatively small so it'll be an easy fix no problem; they'll still all keep the green yoshi tag of course.

You can always put the ones you think are the main one in a set, then you can still find them if the tag is removed.

facelessmess said:
(i'm the yoshi character tagger btw;)

(I know, I checked the tag history before I started. I didn't want this to look like a name and shame attempt.)


BlueDingo said:
You can always put the ones you think are the main one in a set, then you can still find them if the tag is removed.

Thanks for the suggestion but I'll be fine even if the tag is removed; I was doing what I thought was the right in tagging but I may have tagged some posts incorrectly. Luckily it isn't a hard fix; I'm currently removing the tag from images it wouldn't apply to, and other users can do the same if they wish.

BlueDingo said:
(I know, I checked the tag history before I started. I didn't want this to look like a name and shame attempt.)

Ahhhhh gotcha. I didn't think it was malicious or anything don't worry, I just wanted to point it out.